Today Wall Street, Tomorrow the World!

I’m facing a dilemma. Is Barack Obama more like Adolph Hitler or more like Josef Stalin?

Today, our supreme leader BO, after stating no one should begrudge our good business leaders from trying to earn the most they can, immediately begrudged our good business leaders for trying to earn the most they can. It seems he doesn’t believe these people work hard enough.

Let’s see, these people, over the past 12 months, did everything possible, including convincing the government to give them money, to keep their companies afloat. In most cases, they’ve succeeded.

Apparently, BO feels they didn’t have to work too hard for their success.

This from the man who actually had the audacity to accept a Nobel Peace Prize when he admitted he did nothing to earn it?

It’s double-speak of this sort that inspired George Orwell to lampoon Josef Stalin in 1984. The scary thing, though, is BO’s blatant strategy to divide and conquer evokes the cultural tactics of Adolph Hitler. First it’s the seven companies that received TARP. After all, they took government money, so aren’t they beholden to the government anyway? But, wait! What about companies the government regulates? Aren’t they beholden to the government, too? And what about any company that has to – or doesn’t have to – pay taxes? Since the government decides who does and doesn’t pay taxes, aren’t these companies also beholden to the government?

Once we’ve established all businesses must bow to the King, then it’s a relatively short hop to acknowledge other organizations and even individuals also have no rights that supersede those of the government.

Freedom of religion? Not if it violates government policy since, as government decreed tax exempt organizations, they are beholden to the government.

Freedom of speech? Not if BO thinks you’re “talk radio.” Obama told NBC’s Savannah Guthrie: “…if media is operating basically as a talk radio format then that's one thing, and if it's operating as a news outlet that's another…” (“Obama suggests Fox News is like ‘talk radio’,” The Hill, October 22, 2009)

Freedom to associate? Not if you’re a certain individual who wants to buy an NFL team.

The right to bear arms? Let’s not even go there.

So, I hope you can appreciate my dilemma. On one hand, Barack Obama wants to implement totalitarian policies only Stalin would be proud of. On the other hand, he’s using a strategy not unlike that of Hitler.

When he campaigned on the promise of giving us a choice, little did we know…

California Rediscovers Nashua

On a crisp winter evening in New Hampshire, the presidential candidates convened for a debate that nearly didn’t come off. Just a week before, the Federal Election Commission ruled the newspaper-sponsored debate would violate election law – the media could moderate the debate, they just couldn’t pay for it. The Nashua Telegraph withdrew its sponsorship of the match pitting the party’s top two contenders against each other. The leading candidate, afresh with “Big Mo” after his win in Iowa, sighed with relief.

But the fella in the second spot had other ideas. He needed the win and the debate offered him his best chance. He did something no other candidate had ever done – he used his own campaign’s funds to pay for the debate. The leader thought his opponent made a tactical error. The newspaper’s debate had already generated controversy when it refused to invite the other men vying for the nomination. By sponsoring the debate, his rival placed himself smack dab in the middle of said controversy. The pole-sitter decided to do just that – sit and watch his chaser fidget.

The afternoon before the debate, the new sponsor called the paper desperately trying to change the ground rules to include the other candidates. The paper declined. No one knew if the debate would actually occur, so, when the moderator Jon Breen introduced the front-runner, it surprised no one to see the challenger’s seat empty. But Mr. Breen went ahead with his introductions nonetheless. As the moderator readied himself to introduce the empty chair, the defiant competitor marched onto the dais with all the other candidates lock-step behind. The bold move enchanted the heretofore anxious audience. Breen continued to announce the ground rules as if the debate would remain a two-man affair. He immediately began to ask for the first question, ignoring the bevy of politicos behind him.

The sponsor interrupted Breen, stating, “Mr. Green, before the question, you asked me if you could make an announcement first and I asked you for permission to make an announcement myself…”

Undeterred, Breen calmly requested “Would the sound man please turn Mr. Reagan’s mike off?”

The stunned crowd protested loudly and an irate Ronald Reagan shot up from his seat, grabbed the bulky microphone and angrily asked, “Is this on?” When the shouts in the room confirmed they could hear him, he sat back down and continued, “Mr. Green, you asked me if you…”

Jon Breen had had enough. Whether Reagan purposely or accidentally mispronounced his name we’ll never know, but Breen abruptly demanded, “Would turn that microphone off please!”

A miffed Reagan immediately cut himself off, looked in shared disbelief with the audience, then turned to Breen glaring, “I am PAYING for this microphone Mr. Breen!”

And the crowd went wild…

* * * * *

Many continue to believe in his “Nashua Moment,” Ronald Reagan made a statement about fairness. He didn’t. He made a gallant argument about the meaning of property rights. The United States’ prime belief holds property rights above all else. Property rights trumps politics. Property rights overpowers ideology. In America, property rights must even stands ahead of religion. Individuals may choose to subordinate their own rights for these things, but no one man, organization or institution can prevent another for exercising and enjoying his own personal right to property, a.k.a., “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

Reagan understood his microphone represented no mere instrument of political equality. Quite simply, it was his property. He bought it. He had the right to say how others could use it.

On Tuesday, May 19, 2009, the citizens of the State of California rediscovered their inner Nashua. Although we haven’t seen the media reflect on its significance, the title of an editorial in the Washington Examiner tells it all: “Warning to Obama in California Vote.” That a Blue State turned red – at least for one brief shining moment – speaks volumes as to the continued propriety of property rights in America. I could hear Reagan saying of his former constituents, “Today we did what we had to do. They counted on America to be passive. They counted wrong.”

So, ironically, the sun rises from the west. It’s morning in California. Let’s see how long it takes the idea to spread to the opposite coast.

Click here for Youtube of Reagan’s Nashua Moment.

Click here for NBC transcript of the February 23, 1980 news report.

Three Easy Steps to Go Galt

It’s been only a hundred days but it feels like a century. At least that’s how long the “100^th day” celebration seemed to have taken. The good news: Fox, in choosing not to air the Prime Time Obama Love – er, I mean “Press” – Conference, won the ratings sweep for that time period. Maybe people are starting to suffer from Obama fatigue. The bad news: Arlen Specter decided, after forty years, he really was a Democrat after all. We now officially have a one-party government with no systematic checks or balances. Great. Kremlin on the Potomac. We better be careful or Napolitano might banish us to the oil fields in North Alaska.

So, what’s a proud red-blooded American to do in these dire times?

Survive.

Sorry, but that’s the greatest priority. Sure, we can (and should) have fun at regularly scheduled tea parties, but we’ve got to accept the hand fate has dealt us. From the moment W modified the honorable label “conservative” with the lame Alda-esque qualifier “compassionate,” we ought to have known this day would soon be upon us. Yes, just as society lampooned Michael Dukakis for being a “card carrying liberal” in 1988, so, too, the vast popular culture looks with disdain upon “card carrying” conservatives.

True conservatives – those who understand what Liberty meant to our Founding Fathers and why America was and always will be that “Shining City on the Hill” – cannot make the same mistake Dukakis and George W made. True conservatives never will and never should apologize for their love of liberty. We shall wear it like a bold scarlet C emblazoned across our bosom, defying those who choose to stone us, daring those who think they can debate us.

For, you see, imbedded within our very soul lies a deep realization of why Aristotle feared pure democracy. Our form of government – a Republic – as Montesquieu aptly states, demands virtue of its citizens. We embrace the morality that implies it’s more than simply counting all the votes – virtuous policy demands a reasoned debate. Nothing said this more than Benjamin Franklin’s answer to a woman who asked what type of government the Constitutional Convention had agreed upon. Franklin’s terse response: “A republic, if you can keep it.”

But, while survival may be our primary objective, it remains by no means our only objective.

Fortunately, in modern America, the lifeblood of politics comes down to one simple equation: E = mc². In Washington parlance, this translates to “winning Elections equals Money to Campaign the Citizens.” Without money, therefore, a politician’s electoral hopes vanish faster than the speed of light. Take away an elected official’s money and you take away his mouthpiece. Take away his mouthpiece, and the citizens start worrying about other things like Swine Flu, staying employed and, yes, even paying taxes.

If we are to truly “go Galt” – go on strike, if you will – we need to sacrifice. We need to stop buying products that support our political enemies. Many people think the discipline required to successfully strike represents too high a hurdle for free marketers like us. But, look, it worked (unless you really like ’57 Chevys) for three generations with Cuba. Now is the time we need to shield our collective wallets from the socialist fiefdoms sprouting up across America.

Allow me to offer three effortless ways to Go Galt in our current environment:

1) Identify all public, private, profit and not-for-profit institutions you currently do business with – both directly or indirectly.

2) Understand who gets the money you pay to these institutions and identify on which side of the free market aisle they reside. In other words, are they defending the ideal of America or merely looting the American Dream?

3) Do more business with those who have a kindred spirit and less (hopefully none) with those who are enabling the socialist path Obama seems intent to take us on.

Bear in mind, the opposition is already doing this. They don’t believe in free markets, so every purchase they make becomes a political decision. We need to buckle down. Start small. Start with your accountant, lawyer or financial adviser. These are individuals you ought to know well and who reside in highly competitive businesses. You might not be able to do this with your doctor, so just skip your doctor and move on to easier targets. Share ideas with your like-minded friends.

On a national scale, don’t do business with the banks now beholden to the government and, by all means, don’t buy GM or Chrysler if they become nationalized in any way. Ford might not be perfect, but, of the American car manufacturers, to date it continues to have a better idea.

That’s it. Pure, simple and relatively easy, though not necessarily painless. But, you’ve got to ask yourself one question: How much do you love America? Enough to give up your Cadillac? Enough to stop buying Apple products? Enough to forgo the next Dreamworks or Pixar film – or even the movie version of Atlas Shrugged (I mean, come on, Angelina Jolie as Dagny Taggart?!).

Winning is easy. But it’s up to you to start.